Dude. Screw that. I ain't striking from LJ for a whole day!! Where would my sanity sleep? That's so stupid. I don't even know WHAT they're striking over; I like LJ, I use it, I don't really care about the Admin side or wtfever unless it directly affects me.
I'm quoting myself. People are mad that livejournal took away basic accounts first of all. And they're also upset that they're censoring the top interests page as well. Which you can see an analysis of here (http://stewardess.livejournal.com/288147.html). Funny thing, I never even knew the top interests page existed before now. So why care?
Heh, neither did I! I just find it hilarious that LJ is so important to some people that they feel the need to strike over it. Y'hellooo, it's a website, people. Why not strike over something REALLY important?
Well it doesn't make a whole lot of sense ANYWAY. Even if you say that the advertisers are the homophobic ones and not SUP. Advertisers should know that "the gays" have more disposable income since they typically don't raise children. Or, I should say, a vast majority don't in comparison to heterosexual couples.
Not that I'm worried about it. LOL. If I was, I'd strike along with the rest.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-17 10:52 pm (UTC)Dude. Screw that. I ain't striking from LJ for a whole day!! Where would my sanity sleep? That's so stupid. I don't even know WHAT they're striking over; I like LJ, I use it, I don't really care about the Admin side or wtfever unless it directly affects me.
Elaborate if you know more, please?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-17 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-18 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-18 01:09 am (UTC)If you say SUP is homophobic in really BIG text it means more. This is rather hilarious,
no subject
Date: 2008-03-18 01:13 am (UTC)Not that I'm worried about it. LOL. If I was, I'd strike along with the rest.