what is that foulness?
May. 26th, 2009 12:13 pmSo according to the Hollywood Reporter there's a Buffy film re-boot in the works which does not in any capacity involve Whedon or any connection to to show at all. I'm sort of intrigued, given the fact that a lot of reboots have been fairly successful and well-done, and yet I'm viciously skeptical and maybe a little bit protective.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 04:52 pm (UTC)If they really want to pull a do-ever on Buffy, they need to do what BSG did and wait about thirty years 'til we're all old and gray, and snag the new demographics with it.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 06:40 pm (UTC)Buffy reboot without Joss who totally took a cute, fun movie and made it badass and funny and all shades of awesome--I can't say I'm too thrilled, but then again it may be okay.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 08:38 pm (UTC)I mean you sure as heck can't out-do Joss's Buffy, but can you really re-do it either?
Maybe I'm being cynical but it kinda just seems like a way for those people to get a buck out of the whole vampire craze that's been going on.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-28 02:33 am (UTC)